android
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 02-19-2009, 03:04 PM
saratoga saratoga is offline
Rockbox Developer / Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davek View Post
I may be completely wrong, but I don't understand how a 16k point DFT can measure the frequency of maxplanck's test tone beyond a precision of +/- about 3 Hz -- unless I'm missing something.
Well first, for his test tone, the best resolution a 16k DFT can give you is 0.12Hz, not 3Hz (formula is 2*bandwidth/bins).

What I said before was that at 48kHz you got 3Hz, but it depends on the sample rate you choose. I picked 48kHz because its a common value. Its actually not a very good value to choose since the test tone is only 1kHz.

More broadly speaking, you need to consider that the clock probably isn't stable to fractions of a Hz. It probably has a fairly wide fractional bandwidth, just because its a low power, low cost device. You just want to measure it to one part in a hundred or so. Any reasonable sized transform can do that.
Reply With Quote

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.