android
  #1  
Old 12-16-2011, 12:23 AM
zeth006 zeth006 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 102
Default Sony S764 or Cheaper Sony+MDREX85LP?

Hey guy,


Currently in the market for a new Sony (Go Sony!). I've narrowed my choices down to a few available on Amazon. You have the Sony NWZ S764 at $130 with two sets of eadphones, a wireless bluetooth version and the corded version. They ship with the MDREX083 whose quality I am unaware of.


Then there's also the option of going with a cheaper Sony, like this S544 for $77 or this one or this one. I don't know what the difference in sound quality is among all those players, so I was thinking I could get a better deal on sound quality by going with one of those cheaper ones and pairing them with the MDREX85LP earphones


Whaddya guys think? S764, or get one of those cheaper ones and pair it with the MDREX85LP? I've been looking for a replacement for my dead MDREX082's, and I believe the EX85LP may be the replacement for it as its rich bass has been noted.

ETA: Also, could someone suggest a good screen protector for the S764?

Note to mod: Sorry about the redundant thread earlier, I've come to a decision but was hoping to get guidance from the Sony experts.

Last edited by zeth006; 12-16-2011 at 12:50 AM.
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

  #2  
Old 12-16-2011, 06:09 AM
Enigmatic Enigmatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeth006 View Post
I don't know what the difference in sound quality is among all those players, so I was thinking I could get a better deal on sound quality by going with one of those cheaper ones and pairing them with the MDREX85LP earphones
For sound quality, headphones tend to make more of a difference than the MP3 player. When all the signal processing is switched off, a competently-designed MP3 player is probably going to sound about the same as any other competently-designed MP3 player. The signal processing offered is probably going to be a greater variable. If a user is into using signal processing, the result is something we like to call the MP3 player’s sound signature.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 12-16-2011, 08:11 AM
zeth006 zeth006 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigmatic View Post
For sound quality, headphones tend to make more of a difference than the MP3 player. When all the signal processing is switched off, a competently-designed MP3 player is probably going to sound about the same as any other competently-designed MP3 player. The signal processing offered is probably going to be a greater variable. If a user is into using signal processing, the result is something we like to call the MP3 player’s sound signature.

Okey dokes. Wound up picking up one of these and the earphones listed above. Figured I might as well enjoy my old bass which I once really enjoyed on my S-639. Dunno much about signal processing, but I figured based on what you said that there wouldn't be a huge difference in SQ. All the reviews I've come across on that device don't seem to mention technical issues like sound or any SQ-related problems. I'll report back to this thread once I get the earphones and the refurb (This eBay seller bought a bunch of the one I bought when Sony had it going for $35, hence the low price).


Thanks.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 12-16-2011, 08:35 AM
Enigmatic Enigmatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeth006 View Post
Dunno much about signal processing, but I figured based on what you said that there wouldn't be a huge difference in SQ.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_signal_processing.
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.